Wyoming Debate Roundup
  • Blog
  • Get In Touch
  • WFI
  • Team Wyoming
  • Western Series
  • WDF
  • Blog
  • Get In Touch
  • WFI
  • Team Wyoming
  • Western Series
  • WDF

UW Tournament Maps

2/9/2023

0 Comments

 
Competition buildings are: Classroom, Engineering, Ross, Wyoming Union, and Business (circled below).
Central gathering: there will be space for everyone to gather in the Central & East Ballroom of the Wyoming Union (Second Floor). 
Picture
Student Drop-off: the best place for busses to drop off students is the Wyoming Union parking lot (circled below). Setting Google Maps to the “Wyoming Union” will take you straight there. It’s off N 15th St in between Ivinson Ave and Willet Dr.  
Picture
Bus Parking can be found at either of the purple parking lots circled below (Armory & 30th St, or Armory & Television Rd).
Picture
0 Comments

Conditionality Panel - WFI 2022

7/15/2022

0 Comments

 
This year's WFI had a panel of guest coaches gather together to talk about conditionality and the status of counterplans. Our amazing guests included:
  • Jasmine Stidham, coach at The Kinkaid School and Dartmouth College,
  • Mike Shackelford, director of the Rowland Hall debate team,
  • Cody Crunkilton, coach at the University of Minnesota,
  • and Michael Wimsatt, coach at the University of Houston.
Check it out here! 
Picture
0 Comments

The Western Series

7/1/2022

0 Comments

 
The “Western Series” seeks to spotlight online tournaments that are accessible and ensure high-quality judging. Our goal is to make it easy for coaches across the country to find online tournaments they can afford, but that will still be professionally run and high quality. Thus, UW will seek to sanction a few tournaments a semester as “Western Series” tournaments. Our hope is this will be a helpful resource for coaches navigating an evolving online tournament environment, especially those whose programs are interested in dipping their toes into national circuit debate.

Announcing the 2022-23 Western Series:

The Ivy Street Invitational (hosted by the Marist School), 9/24-26
Westminster, 10/15-17
The Heart of Texas Invitational (host by St. Mark's), 10/21-24 [Hybrid]
The Spartan Classic (hosted by Michigan State University), 12/2-4
The Conway Classic (hosted by Gonzaga University), 1/6-7 [Hybrid]
The Stanford Invitational aka Palm Classic, 2/11-13
The Digital Speech and Debate Series #2 (hosted by the University of Kentucky), 2/24-26

Tournament Details
The Ivy Street Invitational
Date: 9/24-26
Host: The Marist School
Modality: Online
Events: Policy, PF, LD
Policy TOC bid: Finals
Entry fees: 
$30 Policy and PF. $20 LD
Independent entries: yes

Westminster
Date: 10/15-17
Modality: Online
Events: Policy
Policy TOC bid: Semis
Entry fees: $20
Independent entries: no

The Heart of Texas Invitational
Date: 10/21-24
Host:
St. Mark's School of Texas
Modality: Hybrid
Events: Policy, LD
Policy TOC bid: Octos
Entry fees (online): $50
Independent entries: no

The Spartan Classic
Date: 12/2-4
Host: Michigan State University
Modality: Online
Events: Policy, Congress
Entry fees: $25 Policy, $10 Congress
Independent entries: case-by-case


The Conway Classic 
Date: 1/6-7 
Host: Gonzaga University
Modality: Hybrid
Events: Policy, LD, PF, Congress, Individual Events
Policy TOC bid: Semis
Entry fees: TBD (updated fee structure posted on website by early fall)

The Stanford Invitational aka Palm Classic
Date: 2/11-13
Modality: Online
Events:
Congressional Debate, LD, Parliamentary, Policy, PF, Speech (All), World Schools
Policy TOC bid: Semis
Entry fees: $100 with a 100% fee waiver to at-need schools upon expression of need
Independent entries: yes

The Digital Speech and Debate Series #2
Date: 2/24-25
Host: University of Kentucky
Modality: Online
Events: Congress, LD, PF, Policy, Speech
Policy TOC bid: Quarters
Entry fees: TBD (aiming for $25/student)
Independent entries: yes


*Honorable Mentions*

The Damus Hollywood Invitational (hosted by Notre Dame High School), 11/11-13. This tournament has a limited hybrid division- apply soon to ensure you get in if you're looking to compete online! Events include policy, LD, and WSD. This is an excellent tournament that is professionally run, has great judging and MPJ, and won't gouge you. It does not allow independent entries.  
​
The Urban Debate Dragon Invitational (hosted by DC International), 11/11-13. This hybrid tournament offers Policy Debate divisions and promises affordability and accessibility. Entry fees have not yet been locked and independent entries will be on a case-by-case basis.

First and Second Year Nationals hosted by Woodward Academy, 3/17-19. We decided to only announce regular season tournaments as Western Series tournaments, but Woodward's First and Second Year National Championship is an excellent tournament that will either be online or hybrid (Policy, LD, PF). It will likely $50 per entry, and independent entries are not allowed.

The Digital Speech and Debate Series hosted by the University of Kentucky. We have announced their second tournament (2/24-25) as a Western Series tournament, however they will also be hosting on 12/2-4 (semis bid) and 3/10-12 (quarters bid). 
Picture
0 Comments

Across the Issues: Ideas, Observations, and Hot Takes

5/17/2022

0 Comments

 
The end of the year always leaves us mulling over the big questions in debate. This year, we invite you to join us in doing the same. We invited ​prominent debate coaches, judges, and college debaters to respond to any item that interested them from a short list of questions about debate. We tried to center the conversation around eternal controversies, contemporary controversies, or things people would want advice on, but we practically invited our guest writers to run wild with their hot takes on debate. 

Below the fold you'll find responses to these questions by Evan Alexis, Eliza Buckner, Cody Crunkilton, Nate Glancy, Lauren Ivey, Matt Liu, David Rooney, and Jasmine Stidham.

Read More
0 Comments

The WFI's Lincoln-Douglas Lab Philosophy

5/15/2022

0 Comments

 
​Author: Lawrence Zhou, University of Wyoming debate coach & head lab leader for the Lincoln-Douglas lab of the Wyoming Forensic Institute

​
The Lincoln-Douglas lab is a one week session for students of all experience levels. It will be taught by Lawrence Zhou. 
​

This lab is oriented around success at the local, regional, and national levels. There are three guiding principles that will guide the curriculum: 
  1. Nothing beats preparation. 
  2. Content knowledge creates skills. 
  3. Practice and practice.

Continue reading below the fold...

Read More
0 Comments

Properly Conceptualizing the Value Criterion in LD Debate: Part III by Lawrence Zhou

10/17/2021

0 Comments

 
Author: Lawrence Zhou, University of Wyoming & WYVA debate coach

The following essay is adapted from a presentation given at the Wyoming High School Forensics Association’s Fall 2021 Conference. 

Introduction
In Part I of this essay series, we covered what the value criterion actually is. In Part II, we explored three common mistakes often seen in more traditional circuits as it pertains to the value criterion. In Part III, we will cover the state of contemporary criterion debate, why I find it subpar, and ways we can improve it. 

In particular, I think there are five things that make contemporary criterion debate abysmal. 
  1. Lots of common mistakes.
  2. Lack of content knowledge.
  3. Unwillingness to take complex concepts and make them accessible. 
  4. Assuming that everything is just utilitarianism.
  5. Not strategically deploying value criterions. ​

Read the rest after the fold!

Read More
0 Comments

Properly Conceptualizing the Value Criterion in LD Debate: Part II by Lawrence Zhou

10/7/2021

0 Comments

 
Author: Lawrence Zhou, University of Wyoming & WYVA debate coach

The following essay is adapted from a presentation given at the Wyoming High School Forensics Association’s Fall 2021 Conference. 
​
Introduction

In Part I of this essay series, we covered what the value criterion actually is. In Part II, we will explore three common mistakes often seen in more traditional circuits as it pertains to the value criterion. I strongly suggest that readers begin with Part I as many of the answers to these questions assume familiarity with the concepts in Part I. 

These common mistakes commonly signal that debaters don’t understand what the role of the value criterion is and can sometimes even hurt debaters strategically in round.  

This article continues below the fold...

Read More
0 Comments

Properly Conceptualizing the Value Criterion in LD Debate: Part I

10/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Author: Lawrence Zhou, University of Wyoming & WYVA debate coach

The following essay is adapted from a presentation given at the Wyoming High School Forensics Association’s Fall 2021 Conference. 

Introduction

The purpose of this series of essays is twofold. 

First, I think that the value criterion is often poorly debated in local debate leagues. I think that is both painful to witness as a judge but also is a strategic error as debaters are forfeiting valuable opportunities to leverage their arguments in ways that pose serious threats for their opponents. 

Second, I think Lincoln-Douglas (LD) debate is a unique venue to teach philosophical concepts that most students will never get the chance to explore until their undergraduate studies. Nebel et al. write (2013) that “competitive LD debate as it is currently practiced brings students into contact with a considerable diversity of philosophical questions” and that “LD debate provides a unique way of appreciating the connections between different areas of philosophical investigation.” Being able to parse through complex philosophical concepts teaches a unique form of thinking that most other subjects are not able to impart. I think, pedagogically speaking, there is good reason for educators to demand higher quality debate about the value criterion. 

This series will be organized into three essays, published in three parts. Part I will provide a brief overview of the value criterion and its proper function. Part II will cover three common misconceptions about the value criterion and explain why these mistakes are so damaging. Part III will cover five worrisome trends in contemporary traditional LD debate and ways to correct or reverse these trends. 
​

This essay continues below the fold...

Read More
0 Comments

UW Tournaments 2021-2022 (Updated)

9/14/2021

0 Comments

 
UW has made a few changes to our hosting schedule for this year. We'll still be hosting four high school tournaments for the 2021-22 season. The date of the UWRR and High School Tournament changed by one weekend (the second weekend in December instead of the first), and we added an LD division to the UWRR.  

The UWRR (12/9-10): The UW Round Robin is our policy and LD debate round robin for Wyoming teams only. **We have added an LD division this year.** The showcase debates will be online, have no fees, and no judging requirement. Compete to win the Sandy S. Patrick Trophy! Please express an interest in entering directly to Matt Liu (mliu6@uwyo.edu). Note: if the UW HS Tournament is in-person, the Round Robin will likely move to January and remain online.

The UW High School Tournament (12/10-11): all events welcome, this tournament is focused on local Wyoming debate. This tournament will tentatively be online and will have no entry fees.

The Western Series @ UW (2/11-13): a tournament for LD and policy debaters. The Western Series is our take on bridging local and national circuit debate in an accessible, high-quality forum. This tournament will have no fees for anyone in the Mountain West. More details can be found here or on the Tabroom page. 

The Western States All-Stars (4/29-30): this is our regional policy debate championship. It is a round robin format with two pods. This tournament will be online, have no fees, and no judging requirement. Compete to win the Western States traveling trophy!
​
[Pictured: last year's UWRR and Western States winners with the respective traveling trophies]
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

The WFI's Open Book Policy

7/21/2021

0 Comments

 
Beginning this year, the Wyoming Forensics Institute will operate an open book policy. We promise the community that we run our camp revenue-neutral, with a focus on serving students and the community rather than funding our college team. Our open book policy is a way of demonstrating the veracity of that promise. 

You can find a copy of our books here. We try to run the camp as close to revenue-neutral as possible. In 2021, extraordinary circumstances diminished interest in a second year of online debate camp, particularly at regional camps and particularly while the rest of the world seemed to be opening up. Rather than cutting our staff with little notice during a pandemic, we decided to extend additional financial assistance to students in order fill our labs to the student-instructor ratio we were comfortable with. Thus, to sustain regional interest in debate, we extended a significant number of tuition waivers. This was made possible by a year of online debate and is not expected to be possible again in the future. 
​

Additionally, we will be disclosing the salary of all staff members who opt-in to disclosure. This year, that includes 100% of our staff. You can find that in the same link above. UW Debate supports a model where camps disclose salary guidelines and the specific salaries offered to each staff member. The goal is to prevent gendered and racialized salary differences by embracing transparency. 
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Mission

    Wyoming Debate Roundup is dedicated to providing quality debate content to Wyoming and Rocky Mountain area high school debaters. We’re a resource for Wyoming debaters by Wyoming debate coaches.

    Essential Reads

    ​Cross-x
    ​Flowing
    Counterplans 101
    ​Tech Tips
    Argument Disclosure
    ​
    Decision Disclosure
    In the Judge's Head

    Other Resources

    WDR on Facebook
    Girls Debate
    ​HS Impact

    ​Debate Musings
    ​One Clap (WY)
    ​Next Off
    Policy Wiki
    ​LD Wiki
    ​PF Wiki

    Categories

    All
    Breakout Features
    College Debate
    Counterplans
    Debate Norms
    Judging
    LD: Topic Analysis
    PF: Topic Analysis
    Policy
    Policy: Topic Analysis
    Public Forum
    Skills

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    July 2022
    May 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.